BeverlyUnderground start pageFind other membersSearch postsGet New PostsRegistration is free!Frequently Asked QuestionsBeverlyUnderground Message Board   
 Last Updated: 3/9/06
 

Logon to the BeverlyUnderground forum member page

 



Not yet a member?
Register here!










 
 
 
   


"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."   J. Edgar Hoover 

Why would the former director of the FBI make such a statement if conspiracies did NOT exist?  

A Matrix-like conspiracy is hard to conceive because it would shake the core of our belief system. The core of what we believe is our country’s foundation. A 9/11 conspiracy could mean that most likely many other historical events involved conspiracies as well. The extent could go beyond our wildest imagination. It could cause severe psychological stress and discomfort to such a degree that we would tend to discount the possibility of conspiracies even in light of the most conclusive evidence, just so that we do not have to face the facts. We would rather be taking the Blue Pill and not deal with it. That’s human nature and that’s what makes conspiracies feasible. Therefore, if you’re not ready to take the Red Pill, DO NOT read this column.


- tHE rED pILL
 



9/11 - Conspiracy "Theory" or "Fact"?

MOTIVE: 

What could be the possible motive behind a 9/11 conspiracy ?

There are many.  

      The first motive would be to create a reason to go to war. Why war? There are many reasons. One motive is to extend/build a dominant US world empire. In light of diminishing world oil reserves, getting control of 10% of world oil reserves (Iraq), restarting the US economy with wartime production, reducing unemployment with enlisting more and more young soldiers etc. Another motive is control over the US population. A terrorist event would, and did, unite America like no other event. It furthermore made it acceptable for Americans to deliberately give up their freedoms in exchange for the government protecting us from the “terrorists”, no questions asked.  

      The Patriot Act was designed to take away those freedoms in exchange for protection against terrorists, it consists of several hundred pages of legislation and was introduced within two days after the 9/11 events !!!! It would have taken months if not years to prepare, so how is it possible that the government had this legislation “on the shelf” on 9/13? Did they have prior knowledge?

 

FIRST HIT: 

First Tower Crash.mpg

First Tower Close-up.mov

      It is just about 8:50 AM EST on 9/11 and the first airliner, a 767, hits the North Tower of the WTC. At this time no live cameras were pointed at the towers since no one knew what was going to happen. However, coincidently a French camera crew was taping a video about NY firemen close by when the first airplane hit. The cameraman actually captured the hit of the first plane thus creating valuable historic evidence.

The video shows the following inconsistencies:

1. Size and Color:  

      The WTC is about 200 ft wide. A Boeing 767 has a wingspan of about 156 ft, which means that the airplane hitting in level flight should pretty much fill up 80% of the entire width of the building.

      The airplane in the video, however, seems to be only about ½ the width of the building, or possibly even less. Also, the airplane appears to have a white tail: a trait that the American Airlines’ fleet does not display.

      Could this airplane be an unmanned (remote-controlled) Global Hawk?

2. Engines 

      The 767 series airplanes are twin engine; they have one engine mounted under each wing. No engines can be observed on the airplane’s wings in the video. 

3. Shot 

      In the video one can see the airplane firing a shot into the building prior to impact.

      The frame firing the shot was originally broadcast on all news stations, but has since been edited out of the commercially available version of this video. Why? Take a look at the frame directly before impact and see for yourself the explosion on the building before impact. 

4. Initial Reports 

      Initial eyewitness reports of the first impact indicated a business jet or commuter size airplane hitting the first tower, which is consistent with the size of the airplane in the video. 

5. Noise 

      The noise of the first airplane is that of a single engine jet, much like a fighter and not that of a twin-engine jet. Listen for yourself and compare the sounds:  

Sound Comparison.mp3

 

SECOND HIT: 

      The second hit occurred about 9:06 AM, roughly 15 minutes after the first. By that time many news cameras were in position and, no question about it, this is a REAL 767 flying into the second tower. However, there are a few problems: 

1. Object Underneath 

      What is obvious about the second airplane is that there is a large object about the size of an engine mounted under the belly. This object is completely inconsistent with a standard 767. One has to realize that on airplanes, unlike cars, modifications of any kind are public knowledge and are signed off by the manufacturer as well as the FAA. There is no evidence whatsoever of the existence of this “pod” underneath any commercially flying 767 in the world today!!!! 

      Could it be a remote control device or a tank for explosive fuels, etc.? That we don’t know.

      However, the only certain conclusion we can make is that this device COULD NOT have been mounted on a United Airlines 767 carrying passengers and therefore this airplane CANNOT be the same airplane that took off with the passengers.  

      Watch the video clips and see the object under the plane as well as the mysterious explosion that seems to be a missile coming from the strange object:

Plane 2 Crash.wmv

Plane 2 Crash Close-up.wmv

2. Flare 

      In the video there is a flare right at the time it hits the building, similar to that of the first hitting airplane. What could be the source of ignition and what is fueling the flare? 

COLLAPSE OF BUILDINGS

1. Temperatures 

      Temperatures achieved in a jet fuel fire usually do not exceed 800º C. More fuel does not mean higher temperatures but merely a bigger fire of the same temperature. The optimal temperature reached by jet fuel is achieved by the optimum amount of oxygen introduced to the flame. 

      Ideal conditions of burning jet fuel are achieved in a jet engine, where an air compressor delivers optimum amounts of oxygen all the time. In a jet engine the maximum burning temperature is about 800º C. 

      Hardened construction steel does not soften at 800º C. It may start weakening at 1000º-1200º C and melts at 2000º C. To prove this point keep in mind that you cannot use a jet fuel based fire to form a horseshoe to fit a horse’s hoof. It’s not possible with fossil fuels; they just do not burn hot enough. On the other hand, think about a kerosene (exactly what jet fuel is) heater. Those are made out of low-grade tin and the kerosene fire does not melt it! All because jet fuel DOES NOT BURN HOT ENOUGH to even melt tin.  

2. Path of Highest Resistance 

      The WTC buildings were designed to withstand the impact of a 707. A 707 is within 10 % of gross weight and fuel capacity of a 767. In the videos the buildings collapse in a fashion that is reminiscent of the controlled demolition of large buildings (like Las Vegas hotels). This is HIGHLY unlikely and defies the very laws of physics. By the way, the name of the Company cleaning up the debris of the WTC buildings was “Controlled Demolition, Inc.”! What a coincidence. 

      What makes these collapses strange is the fact that the collapses are completely vertical which means the buildings goes down the path of HIGHEST RESISTANCE. It would be much more logical if the top part of the buildings tipped over to the sides. 

3. Bombs? 

      The firemen’s radio transmissions are classified. Why? Did they talk about bombs going off in the buildings? The fact is that many eyewitnesses reported hearing explosions go off in the buildings. 

4. WTC Building Number 7 

WTC 7 Video.ram 

      This is a 48-story side building to the WTC complex. Airplanes nor debris never hit Building 7, yet it collapsed after catching on fire making it the first steel framed building in history to collapse strictly due to fire!!!!! The official report is that the foundation was tainted due to the collapse of the other two towers, but none of the other, closer, buildings collapsed. Remember, the foundation in Manhattan is pure rock, which allows for such large buildings to be constructed in the first place. 

OTHER ODDITIES: 

1. Passport? 

      The hijacker Atta’s passport was supposedly found in the street near the WTC, yet the airplanes’ black boxes were never recovered on 3 of the 4 flights (this has never happened before in the history of aviation).  

2. Passenger Lists 

      The official United and American Airlines passenger lists do not have ANY of the hijackers names on them. Look for yourselves:

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html 

3. Still Alive: 

      7 of the 20 hijackers have been confirmed to be still alive AFTER 9/11. 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm 

4. Cell Phone Calls Made by Passengers 

      The government has claimed that passengers made cell phone calls from the hijacked airplanes. The airplanes at the time of those calls were flying at 20,000 ft or above. A study by a British Professor, making cell calls out of a fiberglass (non metal!!) private airplane has concluded that such calls were impossible above an altitude of 2000 ft above ground level!!!! If you’ve ever tried to make cell phone calls in an airplane you’d know that the phone simply will not get reception. 

5. Investigation 

      The buildings collapsed in unprecedented fashion killing thousands and yet there was never an independent investigation into the cause. Why?

      The public was prevented to photograph the 9/11 debris. Why?

      The  “FAILED” hardened construction steel from the towers was immediately shipped off to China without any examination by independent experts. Why?

      $50 million was spent on the space shuttle Columbia accident investigation (which resulted in 7 deaths), yet only $3 million was spent on the 9/11 investigation (which resulted in 2,800 deaths). Why?

      Did the government already know the cause of the collapse? 

 

BUSH’S STRANGE BEHAVIOR: 

Bush Recording.ram

1. Bush claims he saw the first airplane hit the first tower live on TV the morning of 9/11 (download above audio clip). The interesting thing is that the video of the first hit was not made public until after 9/11. 

2. Bush was reading to a class at Booker Elementary School in Florida when the 2nd plane hit around 9:06 AM. His chief of staff informed him of the 2nd airplane by whispering something in his ear for about 5 seconds. By this time Bush MUST know that this is no “accident” (which is what he claimed he thought of the first hit), but rather a terrorist attack of unprecedented proportions. Yet Bush GAVE NO INSTRUCTIONS. EVEN MORE STRANGELY, the secret service does not intervene to protect him. Instead, Bush keeps reading with the children about a pet goat for another 20 minutes!!!!!!  Does this indicate just plain incompetence or prior knowledge? Here’s the video: 

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/schoolvideo.html 

3. Despite the worst attacks in America's history just happening three months ago and the anthrax attacks on America, Bush sums up 2001 as a "fabulous year" for himself and his wife Laura. 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011221-2.html 

Also, Bush feels that 9/11 was an “interesting day” 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020105-3.html  

 PENTAGON HIT:

1. Where’s the Boeing? 

      The biggest piece of Pentagon aircraft debris made public is a 2x3 foot piece of sheet metal. Where are any recognizable pieces of this Boeing that allegedly hit? The landing gear should ALWAYS survive.

      Footage of the Concorde crash in Paris a few years shows the landing gear intact with the wheels and tires still on it even after a very severe fire! It fell in freefall straight down from 2000ft. The landing gear is one of the strongest and most recognizable parts in any crash. It is designed to take the load of many times the airplane’s weight yet the government failed to find it at the Pentagon crash site!!! 

2. Small Impact Hole 

      The initial impact hole in the pentagon is only roughly 30 ft in diameter after which a portion of the building collapses. Was this really a Boeing 757 with 150ft + wingspan hitting? 

CONCLUSION: 

      The above evidence proves that the airplanes that hit both WTC towers are not the airplanes that took off with the passengers. Even more disturbing is that our government did not only have prior knowledge of the attacks, but actively perpetrated them and had a hand in the conspiracy’s cover-up. This means it wasn’t Osama Bin Laden directing the operation from his cave in Afghanistan. It wasn’t Al-Qaida. More likely, it was al-CIAda!!!! The true terrorists are within our own government!


 

- tHE rED pILL

 

 

 

Please send your articles or general questions to the publisher or editor

 

 

 

This site is copyright ©2003, beverlyunderground.org

This Online Newspaper is run from Beverly Hills, California