|
9/11
- Conspiracy "Theory" or "Fact"?
MOTIVE:
What
could be the possible motive behind a 9/11 conspiracy ?
There
are many.
The first motive would be to create a reason to go to war. Why war?
There are many reasons. One motive is to extend/build a dominant US
world empire. In light of diminishing world oil reserves, getting
control of 10% of world oil reserves (Iraq), restarting the US
economy with wartime production, reducing unemployment with
enlisting more and more young soldiers etc. Another motive is
control over the US population. A terrorist event would, and did,
unite America like no other event. It furthermore made it acceptable
for Americans to deliberately give up their freedoms in exchange for
the government protecting us from the “terrorists”, no questions
asked.
The Patriot Act was designed to take away those freedoms in exchange
for protection against terrorists, it consists of several hundred
pages of legislation and was introduced within two days after
the 9/11 events !!!! It would have taken months if not years to
prepare, so how is it possible that the government had this
legislation “on the shelf” on 9/13? Did they have prior
knowledge?
FIRST
HIT:
It is just about 8:50 AM EST on 9/11 and the first airliner, a 767,
hits the North Tower of the WTC. At this time no live cameras were
pointed at the towers since no one knew what was going to happen.
However, coincidently a French camera crew was taping a video about
NY firemen close by when the first airplane hit. The cameraman
actually captured the hit of the first plane thus creating valuable
historic evidence.
The
video shows the following inconsistencies:
1.
Size and Color:
The WTC is about 200 ft wide. A Boeing 767 has a wingspan of about
156 ft, which means that the airplane hitting in level flight should
pretty much fill up 80% of the entire width of the building.
The airplane in the video, however, seems to be only about ½ the
width of the building, or possibly even less. Also, the airplane
appears to have a white tail: a trait that the American Airlines’
fleet does not display.
Could this airplane be an unmanned (remote-controlled) Global Hawk?
2.
Engines
The 767 series airplanes are twin engine; they have one engine
mounted under each wing. No engines can be observed on the
airplane’s wings in the video.
3.
Shot
In the video one can see the airplane firing a shot into the
building prior to impact.
The frame firing the shot was originally broadcast on all news
stations, but has since been edited out of the commercially
available version of this video. Why? Take a look at the frame
directly before impact and see for yourself the explosion on the
building before impact.
4.
Initial Reports
Initial eyewitness reports of the first impact indicated a business
jet or commuter size airplane hitting the first tower, which is
consistent with the size of the airplane in the video.
5.
Noise
The noise of the first airplane is that of a single engine jet, much
like a fighter and not that of a twin-engine jet. Listen for
yourself and compare the sounds:
Sound
Comparison.mp3
SECOND
HIT:
The second hit occurred about 9:06 AM, roughly 15 minutes after the
first. By that time many news cameras were in position and, no
question about it, this is a REAL 767 flying into the second tower.
However, there are a few problems:
1.
Object Underneath
What is obvious about the second airplane is that there is a large
object about the size of an engine mounted under the belly. This
object is completely inconsistent with a standard 767. One has to
realize that on airplanes, unlike cars, modifications of any kind
are public knowledge and are signed off by the manufacturer as well
as the FAA. There is no evidence whatsoever of the existence of this
“pod” underneath any commercially flying 767 in the world
today!!!!
Could it be a remote control device or a tank for explosive fuels,
etc.? That we don’t know.
However, the only certain conclusion we can make is that this device
COULD NOT have been mounted on a United Airlines 767 carrying
passengers and therefore this airplane CANNOT be the same airplane
that took off with the passengers.
Watch the video clips and see the object under the plane as well as
the mysterious explosion that seems to be a missile coming from the
strange object:
Plane
2 Crash.wmv
Plane
2 Crash Close-up.wmv
2.
Flare
In the video there is a flare right at the time it hits the
building, similar to that of the first hitting airplane. What could
be the source of ignition and what is fueling the flare?
COLLAPSE
OF BUILDINGS:
1.
Temperatures
Temperatures achieved in a jet fuel fire usually do not exceed 800º
C. More fuel does not mean higher temperatures but merely a bigger
fire of the same temperature. The optimal temperature reached by jet
fuel is achieved by the optimum amount of oxygen introduced to the
flame.
Ideal conditions of burning jet fuel are achieved in a jet engine,
where an air compressor delivers optimum amounts of oxygen all the
time. In a jet engine the maximum burning temperature is about 800º
C.
Hardened construction steel does not soften at 800º C. It may start
weakening at 1000º-1200º C and melts at 2000º C. To prove this
point keep in mind that you cannot use a jet fuel based fire to form
a horseshoe to fit a horse’s hoof. It’s not possible with fossil
fuels; they just do not burn hot enough. On the other hand, think
about a kerosene (exactly what jet fuel is) heater. Those are made out of
low-grade tin and the kerosene fire does not melt it! All because
jet fuel DOES NOT BURN HOT ENOUGH to even melt tin.
2.
Path of Highest Resistance
The WTC buildings were designed to withstand the impact of a 707. A
707 is within 10 % of gross weight and fuel capacity of a 767. In
the videos the buildings collapse in a fashion that is reminiscent
of the controlled demolition of large buildings (like Las Vegas
hotels). This is HIGHLY unlikely and defies the very laws of
physics. By the way, the name of the Company cleaning up the debris
of the WTC buildings was “Controlled Demolition, Inc.”! What a
coincidence.
What makes these collapses strange is the fact that the collapses
are completely vertical which means the buildings goes down the path
of HIGHEST RESISTANCE. It would be much more logical if the top part
of the buildings tipped over to the sides.
3.
Bombs?
The firemen’s radio transmissions are classified. Why? Did they
talk about bombs going off in the buildings? The fact is that many
eyewitnesses reported hearing explosions go off in the buildings.
4.
WTC Building Number 7
WTC
7 Video.ram
This is a 48-story side building to the WTC complex. Airplanes nor
debris never hit Building 7, yet it collapsed after catching on fire
making it the first steel framed building in history to collapse
strictly due to fire!!!!! The official report is that the foundation
was tainted due to the collapse of the other two towers, but none of
the other, closer, buildings collapsed. Remember, the foundation in
Manhattan is pure rock, which allows for such large buildings to be
constructed in the first place.
OTHER
ODDITIES:
1.
Passport?
The hijacker Atta’s passport was supposedly found in the street
near the WTC, yet the airplanes’ black boxes were never recovered
on 3 of the 4 flights (this has never happened before in the history
of aviation).
2.
Passenger Lists
The official United and American Airlines passenger lists do not
have ANY of the hijackers names on them. Look for yourselves:
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html
3.
Still Alive:
7 of the 20 hijackers have been confirmed to be still alive AFTER
9/11.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
4.
Cell Phone Calls Made by Passengers
The government has claimed that passengers made cell phone calls
from the hijacked airplanes. The airplanes at the time of those
calls were flying at 20,000 ft or above. A study by a British
Professor, making cell calls out of a fiberglass (non metal!!)
private airplane has concluded that such calls were impossible above
an altitude of 2000 ft above ground level!!!! If you’ve ever tried
to make cell phone calls in an airplane you’d know that the phone
simply will not get reception.
5.
Investigation
The buildings collapsed in unprecedented fashion killing thousands
and yet there was never an independent investigation into the cause.
Why?
The public was prevented to photograph the 9/11 debris. Why?
The “FAILED” hardened construction steel from the towers was
immediately shipped off to China without any examination by
independent experts. Why?
$50 million was spent on the space shuttle Columbia accident
investigation (which resulted in 7 deaths), yet only $3 million was
spent on the 9/11 investigation (which resulted in 2,800 deaths).
Why?
Did the government already know the cause of the collapse?
BUSH’S
STRANGE BEHAVIOR:
1.
Bush claims he saw the first airplane hit the first tower live on TV
the morning of 9/11 (download above audio clip). The interesting
thing is that the video of the first hit was not made public until
after 9/11.
2.
Bush was reading to a class at Booker Elementary School in Florida
when the 2nd plane hit around 9:06 AM. His chief of staff
informed him of the 2nd airplane by whispering something
in his ear for about 5 seconds. By this time Bush MUST know that
this is no “accident” (which is what he claimed he thought of
the first hit), but rather a terrorist attack of unprecedented
proportions. Yet Bush GAVE NO INSTRUCTIONS. EVEN MORE STRANGELY, the
secret service does not intervene to protect him. Instead, Bush
keeps reading with the children about a pet goat for another 20
minutes!!!!!! Does this
indicate just plain incompetence or prior knowledge? Here’s the
video:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/schoolvideo.html
3.
Despite the worst attacks in America's history just happening three
months ago and the anthrax attacks on America, Bush sums up 2001 as
a "fabulous year" for himself and his wife Laura.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011221-2.html
Also,
Bush feels that 9/11 was an “interesting day”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020105-3.html
PENTAGON
HIT:
1.
Where’s the Boeing?
The biggest piece of Pentagon aircraft debris made public is a 2x3
foot piece of sheet metal. Where are any recognizable pieces of this
Boeing that allegedly hit? The landing gear should ALWAYS survive.
Footage of the Concorde crash in Paris a few years shows the landing
gear intact with the wheels and tires still on it even after a very
severe fire! It fell in freefall straight down from 2000ft. The
landing gear is one of the strongest and most recognizable parts in
any crash. It is designed to take the load of many times the
airplane’s weight yet the government failed to find it at the
Pentagon crash site!!!
2.
Small Impact Hole
The initial impact hole in the pentagon is only roughly 30 ft in
diameter after which a portion of the building collapses. Was this
really a Boeing 757 with 150ft + wingspan hitting?
CONCLUSION:
The above evidence proves that the airplanes that hit both WTC
towers are not the airplanes that took off with the passengers.
Even more disturbing is that our government did not only have prior
knowledge of the attacks, but actively perpetrated them and had a
hand in the conspiracy’s cover-up. This means it wasn’t Osama
Bin Laden directing the operation from his cave in Afghanistan. It
wasn’t Al-Qaida. More likely, it was al-CIAda!!!! The true
terrorists are within our own government!
|