|
The
JFK Jr. Assassination Conspiracy
"Accident Or Murder?"
Everyone remembers the shocking news of the death of JFK Jr. back in
1999. John F. Kennedy’s airplane was a single engine Piper Saratoga
II, FAA registration number N9253N.

According to the official account,
the Piper was on route to Martha’s Vineyard, a small East Coast
Island located in the Cape Cod area of Massachusetts, when it went
out of control in mid air and spiraled down into the ocean.

All onboard were killed including his
wife Carolyn and her sister Lauren Bessette.
- - -
Before we look into the possibility
that this may not have been an accident, let us first examine the
political background of JFK Jr. and who would have benefited if he
would have died at that particular time.
1999 preceded the infamous November 2000
elections that got George W. Bush into office. During the summer of
1999, the choice of candidates was not clear. The Bushs were eyeing
the presidency for George W. His father, President G.H.W. Bush
learned one painful lesson when he lost his 1992 reelection to
Clinton: the appearance of a second candidate (an independent,
conservative named Ross Perot) can prove disastrous.
Any independent candidate would always be a ‘red
flag’ for a future Bush bid on the presidency as planned for 2000.
While he never announced it, there were rumors that JFK Jr. was
going to run for president as an Independent in 2000. His heritage,
celebrity status, and charisma would have been a force to be
reckoned with for any future candidate. Looking at the close
election results, it is safe to assume that Bush would have NOT won
the 2000 election if JFK Jr. would have made a bid for the White
House.
However, there is another reason why JFK Jr, just
like JFK Sr., was an absolute “no-no” for the powers that be. Direct
your attention to an interview with John F. Kennedy Jr. with the
magazine "George", Oct. 98, Vol. 3 Issue 10, p.136. Please read this
short interview very, very carefully:
http://www.cephasministry.com/nwo_if_i_were_president.htm
It becomes clear in this interview that JFK Jr. is fully aware of
the New World Order, the Illuminati, and, like his father, even vows
to abolish the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 which effectively shifted
control of the American Financial System to a private corporation
called the “Federal Reserve” set up and controlled by none other
than a group of banks, most of which are owned by the Rothschilds.
He even mentions the Freemasons and refers to the
people that truly select the US President as the “money lords”.
After reading this interview it becomes
abundantly clear that a guy like JFK Jr., given his heritage,
charisma, and American “royalty” status COULD NOT BE ALLOWED to run
for public office of any kind, at any time. He was a threat that
needed to be neutralized.
Neutrilized is exactly what happened to him.
Lets take a look at the evidence surrounding the crash of JFK Jr.'s
airplane:
(The following was written by John A. Quinn)
One of the PRIMARY indications the
plane's destruction and the passengers' deaths were NOT the result
of some "accident" is a radio contact made by pilot JFK Jr. to the
Martha's Vineyard Airport flight control tower at 9:39 PM, July 16,
1999.
The timing and content of this radio contact, as
well as the tone of Kennedy's conversation, invalidate to an
overwhelming extent the prevailing, "officially-sanctioned" accounts
of the event promulgated by the federal government through mass
media outlets.
THAT OLD "OFFICIAL" STORY
Now let's go over this "official" "account".
Federal government agencies such as the NTSB and the FAA put forth
(at least publicly) the following scenario regarding the last 10
minutes or so of the flight.
According to them, radar records show Kennedy was
changing altitude and direction somewhat erratically and rapidly in
the minutes preceding the craft's destruction.
The implication here is that these radar records
clearly indicate Kennedy's much-ballyhooed "inexperience" as a pilot
combined with highly "unfavorable" weather/visibility conditions had
resulted in Kennedy being in marginal control of the aircraft for
some minutes before the plane was destroyed; that he eventually
completely lost control and the aircraft plunged headlong into the
sea in a "death spiral".
And at what time, according to these official
accounts, did radar returns show the plane was destroyed? Try just
after NINE THIRTY-NINE PM.
RADIO
CONTACT MADE
A NewsHawk associate has now obtained solid
evidence that JFK Jr. DID in fact make radio contact with flight
controllers at NINE THIRTY-NINE PM July 16.
What's even more important however, is that our
associate also obtained IRREFUTABLE proof that the reported fact of
this radio contact was deliberately removed from archived tape
transcripts of WCVB-TV Channel 5's broadcast of July 17, 1999,
during which-- at approximately 12:35 PM--U.S. Coast Guard Petty
Officer Todd Burgun reported to WCVB the fact of JFK Jr.'s radio
contact the night before.
By later in the evening on July 17 this vital
information was being actively covered up by WCVB and some other
mass media outlets, as it has been in all subsequent government and
mass media reports.
BROADCAST TAPE CUT!
There is now PROOF that this tremendously
important fact of JFK Jr.'s 9:39 PM radio contact was without doubt
DELIBERATELY and literally "covered up": hours of time on the tape
archive of WCVB's July 17 broadcast, during which information on
Kennedy's radio contact was continually reported, have been
intentionally cut.
The record has in fact been FALSIFIED.
We will discuss this extraordinarily significant issue momentarily.
Now of course there is some infinitesimally small
chance that, seconds after Kennedy completed his radio call, either
there was a catastrophic mechanical failure of some kind or JFK Jr.
somehow completely and instantly lost control of the plane; one or
the other possibility (or both) causing the crash.
Nevertheless: the timing, content and tone of
this radio communication leaves the hypothesis that "pilot error"
caused the crash--as drummed unceasingly into the minds of public
through endless mass media regurgitation of such claims by
government officials and agencies--virtually devoid of any
credibility whatsoever: and if WHATEVER caused the crash were TRULY
"accidental", then WHY has the fact that Kennedy made the call been
completely covered up and lied about?
This proof that information on Kennedy's verified
radio contact with flight controllers at 9:39 PM July 16, as
reported to WCVB-TV by Petty Officer Todd Burgun of the Coast Guard,
was subsequently expunged and deleted from ALL government AND media
accounts of the tragedy and indeed specifically DENIED by all
relevant agencies is beyond any reasonable doubt TOTALLY suspicious!
If the destruction of the plane and deaths of all
passengers was "accidental" there is absolutely no reason for
COVERING UP the fact of the 9:39 PM radio contact.
"Well, wait," you say. "Covered up? Lied about?"
Exactly how can we "prove" such a cover-up DID
occur regarding this radio contact? How can we "prove" that what was
indeed initially reported as ROCK-SOLID fact was within a matter of
hours completely expunged from all official accounts and denied by
many persons and agencies directly involved?
We will explain precisely how this can be PROVED forthwith.
Now course, a reasonable person can easily begin
to see there's something just a LITTLE bit wrong with this
"official" picture by now. But don't go away. The picture gets even
worse.
FAA SPECIALIST--WEATHER CONDITIONS "JUST FINE", PREVAILING ACCOUNTS
ON CAUSE OF CRASH "GARBAGE"
Let's get back for a moment to those "official"
claims mass media has bombarded us with over and over again--that
weather/visibility conditions in the Martha's Vineyard region were
lousy.
In FACT, FAA Flight Specialist Edward Meyer of
LaGuardia Airport in Queens N.Y., tapped by FAA administrator Jane
Garvey to prepare the FAA's OFFICIAL report of weather conditions
when Kennedy's plane was destroyed, stated in the report that
visibility in the region was AT LEAST very good on the evening of
July 16.
Meyer himself became SO distressed by endless
spewing of erroneous disinformation about these weather conditions
by government agencies and mass media, he took the unprecedented
step of issuing a public statement ON HIS OWN--which THOROUGHLY
SLAMMED this onslaught of disinformational noise as complete, total
NONSENSE, utterly unsupported by the FACTS.
To quote from Meyer's personal statement as
released to mass media: "The weather along his flight was just fine.
A little haze over eastern Connecticut.
"I don't know why the airplane crashed, but what I heard on the
media was NOTHING BUT GARBAGE."
Thanks for standing up for the TRUTH, Mr. Meyer and God bless you.
Weather radar data for July 16, although
strangely unavailable for the exact time when the plane was
destroyed, DOES show that atmospheric moisture, "haze". etc. were
quite minimal around Martha's Vineyard both before and after the
plane's destruction, in contrast to conditions further west, closer
to the NYC metropolitan area.
Okay. We can forget about poor weather/visibility
conditions contributing to the plane's destruction by "pilot error"
and such.
Next, let's take a look at claims Kennedy was in
fact seriously under-qualified to be flying at all under such
conditions, even though we have just PROVEN weather conditions at
Martha's Vineyard were in fact QUITE GOOD.
PILOT
QUALIFICATIONS: 700+ HOURS FLIGHT TIME, INSTRUMENT FLIGHT TRAINED
Various disinformational sources have claimed
that Kennedy had anywhere from under 100 to at most perhaps 200-300
hours of flight experience at the time of his death. Other almost
laughable disinformation issued forth from spooks, intelligence
agents and dupes of various stripes and nationalities, who spewed
static about Kennedy's recklessness and foolhardiness, culminating
in claims that Kennedy possessed some kind of "risk-taking" geneS
never before heard of in the history of science. And on and on. You
get the picture.
What's the REAL truth about Kennedy's qualifications as a pilot? How
about this.
Every personal flight instructor JFK Jr. EVER had
stated that the man was an EXCEPTIONALLY cautious, prudent and
careful pilot, absolutely NOT given to recklessness or "risk-taking'
of any kind in any way shape or form while flying. Our many previous
articles on this tragedy identify and quote a number of these
individuals.
However, most significant regarding this issue
are statements from John McColgan, Kennedy's federal licensing
instructor in Vero Beach, Florida.
McColgan stated that Kennedy's flight experience
dates back SEVENTEEN years; to 1981. He also reported Kennedy had
over 700 hours total flight time; that Kennedy had completed his
written test for instrument flight rating AND indeed had completed
his training for the in-flight instrument rating test only several
months before his death. Kennedy just hadn't taken the in-flight
test.
McColgan noted that Kennedy WAS basically
qualified to fly on instruments alone (NOT that he would have even
NEEDED to around 9:39 PM July 16, 1999 near Martha's Vineyard), and
furthermore called Kennedy an EXCELLENT PILOT.
SO, we can now forget about claims that Kennedy was an
inexperienced, under-qualified, reckless, "risk-taking pilot.
THE CRITICAL 9:39 PM RADIO CONTACT
NOW, let's look at what was going on in the air
over the water near the southwest part of Martha's Vineyard on July
16, 1999 at around 9:39 PM.
What WAS going on was that Kennedy radioed the Vineyard airport
control tower.
According to UPI's news bulletin titled "Hopes
Fade For Missing Kennedy Plane" (UPI Focus) AQUINNAH, Mass., July 17
(UPI) -(as excerpted verbatim from the article at --
http://www.upi.com/corp/news/jfkjr3.html)
' At 9:39 p.m. Friday, Kennedy radioed
the airport and said he was 13 miles from the airport and 10 miles
from the coast, according to WCVB-TV news in Boston. He reportedly
said he was making his final approach.
' Moments later, radar operated by the
Federal Aviation Administration showed the plane went into a dive
and dropped 1,200 feet in just 12 seconds, according to ABC News.
' In his final approach message, WCVB-TV
said Kennedy told controllers at the airport that he planned to drop
off his wife's sister and then take off again between 11 p.m. and
11:30 p.m. for Hyannis Airport.
Although these crucial facts regarding Kennedy's 9:39 PM radio
contact were reported by WCVB-TV Boston as well as by UPI and
several other local TV stations in the Martha's Vineyard area, they
were removed from WCVB's reporting later in the evening on July 17,
subsequently disappeared from UPI's accounts within about 24 hours
and were also subsequently DENIED by airport personnel.
Indeed news of Kennedy's radio contact never even
made it to some mass media outlets and if it did was quickly
expunged from later reports.
Questions put to WCVB-TV personnel several days
afterward about their broadcast of this information were
disingenuously skirted; though never outright denied. One such
statement from the station was: "we don't "BELIEVE" we broadcast
that information."
Well, it turns out there's a good reason WCVB
personnel never outright denied having broadcast this information,
because THEY DID broadcast it!
How do we know? BECAUSE WE HAVE NOW OBTAINED THE TAPES OF THAT VERY
BROADCAST!
WCVB-TV BOSTON BROADCASTED REPORT OF JFK Jr.
RADIO CALL FOR SEVERAL HOURS-- TAPE ARCHIVES LATER ALTERED, ALL
REFERENCES TO INFORMATION DELETED
The tape of WCVB's broadcast of Saturday, July
17, starting at about 12 noon, was obtained from Corporate Media
Services of Auburn, New Hampshire, which archives tapes of TV
broadcasts and markets copies.
On the tape, at approximately 12:35 PM, WCVB news
anchor Susan Warnick reports there is a significant new development
in the case of Kennedy's missing plane.
Says Warnick: "We have been told by the Coast Guard
that in fact there IS now EVIDENCE of a last communication, last
night, with JFK Jr.'s plane as it was ON APPROACH to Martha's
Vineyard Airport. Petty Officer Todd Burgun joins us from the Coast
Guard base in Boston. He is a petty officer and public information
officer.
"Thank you for being with us, sir. What can you tell us about this
last communication with JFK Jr.'s plane?"
The station cuts to a live audio feed from
Todd Burgun at U.S. Coast Guard headquarters in Boston. Burgun
begins speaking as follows: "All I know at this time is that it was
at 9:39 PM, and it was with the FAA and it was on approach?"
And, on the archive tape of the broadcast as originally received,
THAT'S IT!
INCREDIBLY, the first archive tape
transcript/copy received from Corporate Media Services is CUT--right
there! Just as Petty Officer Todd Burgun begins his report on newly
discovered evidence of the 9:39 PM radio call from Kennedy!
THIS tape then resumes with WCVB's broadcast from approximately 6 PM
that evening.
How about that. The tape transcript of WCVB's
July 16 broadcast is inexplicably cut JUST as Todd Burgun of the
U.S. Coast Guard begins his report of what the announcer had most
appropriately called a major, very significant new development in
the case. There is a gap of over FIVE HOURS in the tape of their
broadcast that day--as first received.
STATION ANCHORS LIE IN EVENING BROADCAST
Now any guesses what the first words out of the
mouth of the evening news anchor are when the tape of the broadcast
resumes at 6 PM? The announcer, fidgeting, fumbling for words,
looking nervous, distraught and downright UPSET, haltingly and
stutteringly makes the following, tortuous, garbled and HIGHLY
unconvincing statement.
"Something that we had THOUGHT earlier (FIRST
lie--there was NO 'thought' involved at all: rather an UNEQUIVOCAL
official report from the Coast Guard) MAY not be TRUE: that there
WAS actually NO radio communication (SECOND lie--one moment she says
"may not be true" and in the next breath says "there WASS noS
communication") with JFK Jr.'s plane after it left New Jersey.
"We had HOPED ("we" had?) that there was some
radio communication of course (?), most recently at Martha's
Vineyard (?). This this (uncomfortable pause) -- last night at about
NINE O'CLOCK, NINE- THIRTY (being obviously aware of the TRUTH of
the radio contact she inadvertently gives the location and general
time of the actual contact!!), when perhaps things STARTED TO GO
WRONG (?!) (giving away the truth again!).
"We had hoped we could learn from that, but it
SEEMSS thatS thereS (another uncomfortable pause)-- MAY be NO
EVIDENCE (MAY be?) because (and here's the zinger) there MAY be no
RECORDING to listen to TO GET THESE DETAILS FROM!"
Whew! A look of immense relief crossed the
announcer's face as she manages to finish her obviously distressing
task of lying bold-faced to the camera; her hands and those of her
co-anchor fidgeting continuously throughout her ordeal. The entire
scene just REEKS of someone having just been told by higher-ups to
"get out there" and LIE.
And even in the depths of this mishmash of lies
and falsifications, the announcer does not--or probably CAN
not--just state plainly and simply: "the Coast Guard was
mistaken--there was no radio contact between Kennedy and the
airport." Period.
Naturally, our source's interest was highly
provoked at this clear evidence of falsification of the record and
got in touch with Corporate Media Services in regard to the
situation. He was given some lame excuse as to why the station had
wanted their tape archive cut at that point, which of course had
nothing to do with the incredibly important information reported on
during the time period missing from the tape first received.
Prevailing upon the personnel at Corporate Media
Services, he was able to obtain an UN-CUT tape copy of WCVB's July
17 broadcast, which had on it the portion of the broadcast cut from
the first tape.
And guess what? On the UN-CUT tape of the
broadcast, Officer Burgun goes on to deliver his full report, which
makes note of those points reported by UPI as quoted above: that
Kennedy, completely calm and obviously "in command" of himself, his
craft and the overall situation, was on approach to the airport and
had given his approximate position and trajectory as well as made a
comment about dropping Lauren Bessette off and then continuing on to
Hyannis.
This tremendously significant information
is then referred to REPEATEDLY for the next several hours by WCVB;
with EVERY possible indication that Kennedy's 9:39 radio contact is
absolute, ROCK-SOLID, verifiable FACT!
And that's what was cut from the tape archive of the station's July
17 broadcast.
EXPLOSION IN THE AIR
Most interestingly as well, ALSO reported by WCVB
news anchors repeatedly during that portion of the broadcast which
was cut, is the fact that a reporter for the (Martha's) Vineyard
Gazette who was on Philbin Beach (southwest end of Martha's
Vineyard) the evening of July 16 saw an AIRBORNE EXPLOSION in the
general vicinity of the sky where Kennedy's plane was destroyed at
approximately 9:40.
THIS information was also covered up and outright
denied by all relevant parties and agencies in all subsequent
government and media accounts of the event.
CUTTING
OF BROADCAST TAPE PROVES COVER-UP-- COVER-UP PROVES CONSPIRACY, FOUL
PLAY
Now, as we've noted, although the timing, content
and tone of Kennedy's 9:39 PM communication with flight controller
personnel in and of themselves almost COMPLETELY invalidate the
possibility "pilot error"--especially--or even some chance
catastrophic mechanical failure caused the plane's destruction,
there is still an incredibly small chance that seconds after this
communication one or the other eventuality did occur.
However, if that WERE in fact the case, then WHY
has the absolutely undeniable FACT of this radio contact been
COVERED UP in every official statement and news story on the
incident beginning later in the day on Saturday, July 17 and
continuing on until the present?
If Kennedy had an ACCIDENT, then WHY has the TRUTH been covered up?
This irrefutable proof of cover-up can only mean
that the deaths of Kennedy, his reportedly pregnant wife and her
sister didn't happen "by accident". This can only mean they were
murdered by means of deliberate destruction/sabotage of the
aircraft.
And that IS the truth, the whole truth and nothing BUT the "UN-CUT"
TRUTH.
Just think about the degree and intensity of
pressure which was applied to the owners/managers of WCVB-TV Boston
to make them force their news crews to deliberately and knowingly
LIE on camera about what the station had just previously reported
for several hours straight; which was applied to Martha's Vineyard
airport personnel to make them lie when questioned about Kennedy's
radio contact; which was applied to WCVB's owners/managers to make
them have Corporate Media Services alter/falsify the tape archive of
the station's July 17 broadcast.
Think about WHAT THIS MEANS about present conditions in the United
States of America.
|